A Bayesian interpretation of cross‐linguistic ambiguity tests
نویسندگان
چکیده
Cross-linguistic comparisons serve as empirical tests generating evidence for and against lexical ambiguity in words like “good”, “know”, “the”, “can”, “may”. Critics question such comparisons' validity. This article examines how cross-linguistic are treated shows that they have two predominant forms: one modeled on modus tollens, another Bayes' theorem, where the former is an enthymematic version of latter. analysis reveals strengths weaknesses comparisons, thereby guides interpretation their results. It concludes generally yield stronger than it.
منابع مشابه
Ambiguity and Idiosyncratic Interpretation
This paper discusses logics whose premisses and/or conclusions can contain ambiguous material. Two different kinds of applications are sketched for these logics. First, the paper discusses how logics with ambiguous expressions can shed light on the way in which human hearers or readers understand certain 'paradoxical' logical arguments, in which crucial use is made of ambiguous material. Second...
متن کاملSemantic Interpretation and Ambiguity
A new approach to semantic interpretation in natural language understanding is described, together with mechanisms for both lexical and structural disambiguation that work in concert with the semantic interpreter. ABSITY, the system described, is a Montague-inspired semantic interpreter. Like Montague formalisms, its semantics is compositional by design and is strongly typed, with semantic rule...
متن کاملAmbiguity, Underspecification and Discourse Interpretation
A formal analysis of ambiguity processing is a necessary prerequisite for the development of a theory of underspecification and discourse interpretation for NLP systems. The analysis presented here is based on a distinction between semantic ambiguity and perceived ambiguity. A sentence is semantically ambiguous if it has a multiplicity of interpretations; a form of underspecified representation...
متن کاملthe washback effect of discretepoint vs. integrative tests on the retention of content in knowledge tests
در این پایان نامه تاثیر دو نوع تست جزیی نگر و کلی نگر بر به یادسپاری محتوا ارزیابی شده که نتایج نشان دهندهکارایی تستهای کلی نگر بیشتر از سایر آزمونها است
15 صفحه اولذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Mind & Language
سال: 2022
ISSN: ['0268-1064', '1468-0017']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12423